Floating islands of plastic are no one’s idea of a good thing, and now major brands like Procter & Gamble, Nestlé, Unilever, and PepsiCo are looking into reusable containers to address consumer concerns about disposable plastic and the waste it creates.
Single-use packaging is much of the culprit in creating islands of trash in the Pacific. In response to consumers’ complaints about this waste, manufacturers of shampoo, detergent, and packaged food will begin testing this summer to see if they can sell their products in glass, steel, and other materials designed to be returned and refilled.
Unilever will put deodorant in refillable steel containers. PepsiCo will sell orange juice in a glass bottle. P&G will sell its Pantene shampoo in an aluminum container. The products will not change, but their outward packaging will, and in so doing will respond to demands for recyclability and reuse.
Although the products in the reusable packaging won’t cost more, they willrequire consumers to pay for a deposit and arrange to return the refillable containers. The companies testing the packaging are waiting to see if their investments in the sustainable packaging will fly. Because unless a lot of people—not just the most eco conscious—are willing to do more than complain about waste, the mountains of plastic will just keep growing.
- Why is it in the interest of big companies to offer reusable containers?
- What kinds of entrenched human behavior will these big brand manufacturers have to combat for reusable containers to become mainstream?
- What do you think motivates these companies to curtail plastic waste?
Would you blast your playlist in a communal work space? How about microwaving leftover fish so everyone in the office could “enjoy” your reheated leftovers? Probably not. But what about vaping?
As e-cigarettes become more popular, people in the workplace are steamed about having to unwillingly smell the scented vapors the devices emit. In fact, even the e-cig manufacturer Juul had to ban its own employees from vaping while at work to comply with a 2016 California law prohibiting vaping in the workplace.
California is one of twelve states and many cities that have enacted laws against vaping, the practice of inhaling vapor from a battery-operated device that contains liquid with nicotine, flavorings, and other chemicals. However, the regulations haven’t been broadly publicized and are not regularly enforced, leaving many non-vapers unhappily inhaling the scents, just as non-smokers were forced to breathe in second-hand smoke years ago. And while inhaling the exhaled vapors from e-cigarettes has not been shown to cause medical problems, it is most definitely causing workplace irritation.
Some find the sucking sound made when inhaling the vapor disturbing, while others grouse about the odor creeping its way into their spaces. Still, the practice is not prohibited in many states, and so vapers continue to vape, whether it’s sneaking a puff in the bathroom or ignoring the building policies requiring smokers of anything—e-cigarette or tobacco—to take their habit outdoors, often to a designated area.
Whose rights should take precedence?
From The Wall Street Journal
- If vaping hasn’t been proven to cause medical harm, should it be allowed in public spaces?
- Should employers enforce anti-vaping regulations to the point of punishing or firing those who don’t comply?
- What would you do if you were in the situation of having to breathe the exhaled vapor of an e-cigarette against your wishes?
Employers Want New Hires Who Can Chitchat
It’s well and good for a new-hire to be a whiz at coding or analyzing data, but possessing social skills is becoming just as important.
Social skills are the ability to interact and communicate with people verbally and nonverbally through gestures, body language, and even physical appearance. Unfortunately, it’s a set of skills employers are not finding in their millennial and Gen Z hires.
Social skills are particularly important in today’s workplace, say experts, because jobs requiring social interaction are on the upsurge, while the number of less social jobs is decreasing. The reason makes sense. As artificial intelligence takes the place of many positions requiring repetition, people who can interpret others’ feelings become more valuable. “There’s no way to program a robot to figure out when a customer has had a bad day,” says Prof. David Deming of Harvard’s Kennedy School.
Just as important are social niceties once taken for granted. Employers complain that many of today’s employees are unskilled at knowing when to shake a hand or even how to. Some organizations have found it necessary to create training modules to teach young employees how to converse casually. It’s no surprise such training is needed, considering the number of hours the younger generations interface with smartphones rather than humans.
With Bank of America training employees to show empathy, medical clinics using online courses to help workers learn to deal with touchy conversations, and Subaru creating a development program that covers topics such as punctuality and wearing appropriate attire, it’s clear employers need workers who can socialize and show human emotions. Just as clear is the fact that those who can demonstrate such skills will be in high demand.
From The Wall Street Journal
- Why do you think young people may not possess the social skills that were taken for granted in past generations?
- Can you identify a list of social skills that would be worthwhile to develop to make you more marketable?
- Why is it so important to look someone in the eye when shaking hands?